NAHBS 14, Part V

NAHBS 14, Part V

 

NAHBS has been marked by more controversies than any other event I’ve personally attended. Emotions run high at this thing, and honestly, they run high not just during, but before and after. A number of people questioned my sanity for getting further involved in the judging. For me, it was a way to insulate the other judges from any possible BS (and there was very, very little BS) as well as have a guiding hand in something I think is terrifically fun. I made the decision that I’d have fun before I ever walked in the show, and as it happened, I had fun the entire time.

IMG_8118

None of that is to say the task before us was easy. Without a number of compulsory details to compare from one bike to the next, judging NAHBS awards has yet to take on the point tallying of Olympic figure skating or gymnastics. As a result, judging remains a more obviously subjective endeavor, and frankly I like it that way. I’d hate for every builder vying for some crown in lugged construction to have to present a frame with specifically reshaped points, fillets added to specific lugs and at least one bi-laminate joint. That would suck the enthusiasm out of the room faster than having to ride a Huffy.

IMG_8123

The bikes you’ll see in this post, beginning with this Ellis built by David Wages, are the bikes that made the judging difficult, the bikes that ultimately received honorable mentions. This Ellis was submitted for best finish. Jason Sanchez is Wages’ painter of choice and the guy is fantastically talented. If you look very closely in the shot above, you’ll see rows of chainrings in the faintest white against the cream of the paint. It’s a crazy detail. Another element of Sanchez’ work that really captures my attention and appreciation is how he paints only the tube a given color and paints all of the lug the other color. It was common with the English builders to paint up the shoulder of the lug, but that never made any sort of logical sense to me. It seems that the lug should be all one color. However, this work is terribly difficult that Sanchez’ crisp shoreline all the way around each lug was remarkable. Even Joe Bell commented on how good it was.

IMG_8121

There are plenty of painters out there who lay on coats of paint so thick that the crisp edges of a builder’s lugs dull under the weight of all that enamel.

IMG_8122

That Sanchez had already prepped the stainless steel bottle bosses so that no paint could be chipped away by a bottle cage was an attention to detail that is was rare, even in that room. The point behind giving this bike an honorable mention was that we were troubled that it wasn’t going to be better recognized. It was absolutely worthy; we just thought the Independent Fabrication mountain bike that won was more attractive, showed a bit more imagination. This is the bike that made the final decision difficult.

IMG_8143

I’m going to go on record saying that I struggle with the idea of wooden bikes. I spent too many years as a drummer, watching drumsticks break—sometimes after only a single hit—along grain lines with the sudden surprise of a drive-by shooting. I will never descend a mountain road on a piece of wood. There’s just no need for that risk. Now, that said, for something as overbuilt as this workman’s bike presented by Calfee, a creation that’s unlikely to top 20 mph, I think I can make an exception.

IMG_8144

This rig was a submission for the best theme bike and ultimately lost to Jeremy SyCip’s picnic cargo bike.What made the bike intriguing were the many ways Calfee kept the workman’s theme going through the bike. The fork blades are hewn from axe handles, as are the grips.

IMG_8145

The axe handles make pretty good-looking forks, honestly. And the brake disc was fashioned from a circular saw blade.

IMG_8146

This thing may have weighed as much as a Labrador Retriever, and would have been just as much fun to carry, so the Bosch e-assist made perfect sense.

IMG_8147

The stem and handlebar employed plumbing fixtures. Bar flex wasn’t an issue.

IMG_8148Of course, this wouldn’t have been much of a workman’s bike if you couldn’t have some tools handy. The seat doubled as the lid to the tool box and featured a lock so that the tools couldn’t be stolen while on a job. As much as we loved the bike, it seemed a novelty when compared to the SyCip, which despite its very special-purpose nature still seemed more practical, as if there’s a world in which picnics, cookouts and parties are practical matters. They were when I was 20.

IMG_8045

Not all bikes showed up for all categories right on time. As chief judge, it was my call as to whether a bike that showed up late was considered. That it was even a question flabbergasted the other judges and me. The awards are about how good your building is, not how punctual you or your staff are or how well you follow directions. If the bike showed up, it got considered. So as we were busy considering our entrants for the best TIG welding and this tandem was leading the field when Kent Eriksen Cycles’ frame showed up.

IMG_8047

It was the welding on this yoke that had us thinking we had our winner. We were stunned to encounter something that topped this. We didn’t actually give this an honorable mention, but the frame was worth acknowledging. I just wish I knew whose frame it was. Volunteers brought it over and returned it without a word. Someone within the NAHBS organization had taken it upon themselves (I still don’t know who) to add a final criteria to the construction categories, stipulating that all entries should be completely anonymous—in order to avoid bias. It was crazy. When Steve Potts asked me about it, I told him not to worry and that he could put as many decals on his bikes as he wanted, so long as we could see the joints.

So this would be where I address judging bias. At one point I received word that a builder had accused me of bias against him. So I went over and introduced myself. Then I informed him it was hard for me to have any bias against him because I didn’t know him. Then we talked for half an hour and figured out we both liked each other pretty well. Of course, negative bias isn’t the only kind of bias there is. At one point Nick Legan asked to recuse himself from voting on the Best New Builder because he’d become friends with Kevin Harvey of Harvey Cycle Works and had gone as far as to order a frame set from him. I wouldn’t allow it for the simple reason that if he’d recused himself from voting on that award, I’d have had to recuse myself from virtually all the judging. I consider a great many people in the forum to be friends. If friendship were grounds for recusing a judge’s vote, I don’t think I’d have been able to be a judge at all. It would be difficult for anyone with the requisite knowledge to be a judge because, generally, friendship precedes knowledge where frame building is concerned.

Those friendships are important to me and I do value them, but for the judges to recognize anything but the very best work would be an insult to the work and the honesty that undergirds all friendships.

IMG_8077

This fillet-brazed Lundbeck cyclocross bike gave us fits. Overall, the ‘cross category had a very high level of achievement. It was very difficult to determine a winner. There were at least four bikes that might have won in other years. We selected the Retrotec because to a man the judges all agreed it was the bike that best reflected the sort of riding they were most likely to do, if they owned that bike. Had the panel been made up of a bunch of guys who would race both their traditional category and single speed when at a ‘cross event, then this Lundbeck would have been a shoe-in.

IMG_8078

The special genius behind this bike is how the builder used horizontal dropouts to accommodate a single-speed setup plus a quick-connect normally used with an S&S-coupled bike plus a threaded braze-on to hold the cable when in single-speed mode. It was one of the more creative flashes we saw all weekend.

So why didn’t this bike win? Here’s where it’s worthwhile to discuss another of our judging criteria: commercial considerations. There’s little point in displaying a frame at NAHBS if you’re not interested in pursuing frame building in some commercial capacity. The very best thing that can happen at NAHBS isn’t to win an award, but to receive a bunch of orders for new bikes. Imagine if the show were so popular that builders only took orders there because they knew that they’d need the entire rest of the year to build the orders they took.

The real issue is that the smartest, most successful builders keep one eye on the market at all times. That doesn’t mean they necessarily begin chasing carbon fiber, but it means that once they realize that almost no one really orders or rides rando bikes, they stop showing them in their booths. It’s important to show bikes at NAHBS that cause people to connect the dots between them, the bike, and a long ride in beautiful country. A bike should inspire dreams of riding.

Put another way, if you’re a frame builder and decide to display the world’s only carbon-fiber rando bike with racks you made yourself, but the completed bike still weighs 30 pounds (so it can support that bag and the racks without breaking the moment you hit a pothole) and costs $20k, the judges will marvel at the workmanship, but you’ll be dinged for the fact that almost no one wants your completely unaffordable masterpiece.

IMG_8079

These dropouts aren’t the most beautiful, but the fact that Lundbeck was able to incorporate a derailleur hanger to make this bike easy to convert was really impressive. If you had a spare wheel, we estimated you could change from single-speed to derailleur, or vice versa, in about five minutes. As the owner of an S&S-couple bike, one of the great things about those quick-connects is that once you screw them together, your derailleur will need no further adjustment; it’s at the correct tension, unless something happened to turn the barrel adjuster.

IMG_8080

Fillet-brazing is the least-common form of joinery we see in the judging. It’s fair to say that it’s more time consuming, if not necessarily something that requires greater skill than TIG welding; in my head, I give about the same weight to a fillet-brazed frame that I do to a lugged bike where I can tell the points have been reshaped.

One of the other criteria that figures when judging for the awards is whether the builder is all-in. Our preference is to recognize work by guys who do this full-time. The term “hobbyist” is somewhat insulting to a builder who doesn’t do it full-time, but anyone whose next meal isn’t governed by getting bikes packed up and out the door enjoys a kind of luxury to labor over final details. It’s important to recognize those craftsmen who can do great work on time and at a profit. If we see two bikes of relatively similar merit but one bike has a few extra details (say fillets in the lug transitions) to make the bike extra sexy, and say that bike with the extra touches was built by someone who works full-time as a machinist on the side, we’re likely to recognize the other bike because we recognize that ultimately, awards should have the power to result in more orders. Bottom line: these are supposed to be works of art you can purchase.

IMG_8081

The use of color on this bike helped make it unforgettable. Stripes and rings are design elements ripe for poor use. I see them done wrong all the time. This wasn’t one of those occasions. The way the rings in the down tube became stripes in the fork was pretty lovely. IMG_8113

This city bike from A.N.T. was very close to getting the award for best city bike. In some ways it’s a better expression of what a city bike is supposed to be than the Cykelmageren that won because Mike Flanigan can produce these far faster, getting more people out there. It’s eminently practical thanks to the Gates belt drive, rack and fenders. IMG_8114

But there’s nothing to say that practical can’t also be beautiful, right?

IMG_8115

I love that even if someone hit this entire bike with flat-black rattle-can, you’d always be able to tell it was one of Flanigan’s creations.

We received some questions here and there about awards. My sense was that on many occasions there was a sense that someone felt a given bike had lost because it hadn’t gotten a nod. I think that’s a perception problem. I saw only a few bikes submitted for awards that weren’t worthy of consideration. Most of the bikes were really special, so in my mind, and I believe this was true for the other judges based on our conversations was that when a bike didn’t get an award was the reality was that another bike simply won. Not winning isn’t a dis, and I certainly encountered people who took it that way.

I know that in the past there was concern that due to a lack of transparency the judging was this mad cabal of guys who started picking names before walking in the hall. I know a few of the guys responsible for the judging in the earlier years and I’m unable to conjure the cynicism necessary to think that they’d recognize anything that isn’t stellar work. But because we often marry our perception to what we believe reality to be, I’ve wanted to give readers a chance to peek under the hood and understand what we look for.

To sum this up, the first thing we hope to see is a bike that grabs our eye. Everyone wants a pretty bike, right? But there needs to be more than just paint. The bike needs to reflect some slice of riding that really happens. Again, rando; I dare you to find 50 people in any community on the planet who are riding that style of bike as their primary rig. A fair question I put to myself is whether it’s a bike that fits with any kind of riding I’ve ever done or I see being done now (I’m not really a dirt jump guy, but I respect what that is and dig it). Does the parts pick fit? It ought to make sense from a usability standpoint. Is the builder able to deliver the bike? I respect that some builders have a long wait list. That’s different from a guy who sometimes builds in his buddy’s garage and has no liability insurance.

In the construction categories, we simply look at the joinery. I don’t care if it’s a track bike or a fat bike, unless something in the bike’s design makes the joinery more difficult.

What was the builder’s intent? It’s easy for me to drool on a frame from David Wages. Actually, it’s hard for me not to. However, his aesthetic is entirely different from Carl Strong’s. Had Strong entered a bike in a category that an Ellis was entered, I’d have had to consider that his aesthetic weights different considerations. Strong’s style runs austere. He’s not into decoration and feels one of his top duties is to get a bike to his client with all due haste. In his case, a lack of decorative elements isn’t a liability, but only because it’s part of his personal philosophy. There are a bunch of guys out there who make reasonably affordable TIG-welded road and mountain bikes that are short on flash and long on practicality. Getting a bike that’s reliable at a good price this year matters and any time I’m faced with one of those bikes, I do all I can to consider that.

Judging doesn’t happen in a vacuum. We don’t hold up a bunch of cards that say 9, 8, 9, 6 (the Russian judge). It’s a conversation, so in many ways the final choice comes down to each of us selling the others on the factors that we see as important. There were occasions that I forgot (or was unaware of) a detail and one of the judges would point it out. With one exception, our votes were unanimous and reaching consensus was important to us because in our minds, if we couldn’t agree, why should anyone attending the show have any faith in us?

I’ve been interviewing frame builders for more than 20 years. I find these craftsmen as fascinating today as I did then. The combination of builder web sites, Flickr accounts, social media and NAHBS has done much to propagate just what great work is. As a result, I’m excited to tell people that I really think we’re in the golden age of frame building.

, , , , , , , , , ,

21 comments

  1. TobinH

    Rando bikes are very common at rando events…not sure why you would think otherwise. Off the top of my head I can name owners of Rawlands, Boulders, BoxDog Pelicans, VO Polyvalents, the new Soma bike, etc. Fenders are a must here (PNW) so you might as well use good ones. Few people are going to ride 400kms+ without some kind of baggage, and the front seems like the best place to put it. Where did you get this idea about rando bikes from?

    All of these riders give their bikes hard use – I certainly have never seen an expensive steel cross bike at a race with a fancy paint job – for pretty obvious reasons! And who is sinking thousands into their city bike?? You’re really going to lock up that ANT up there outside the pub downtown? Not that these are reasons to dismiss the builders’ art, but to suggest ‘useability’ is a criteria when looking at a $5k city bike is a bit laughable.

  2. Sam Klontz

    I must call attention to the statements made about the final decision in the CX category regarding full time builders. For a beginning builder who may not yet be full time, I believe it should not come into consideration when judging their bikes against someone who does do it full time. How are you to know if the builder is working towards becoming a full time builder, while juggling a family, financial obligations, etc? If the competition is truly about the bikes, then make it so. As someone who rides AND races cyclocross, the winning bike in that category is useful for only one of those things, and barely so at that. But alas I am not a judge nor do I have any internet credibility to potentially be one in the future. I did however see several facets of the “competitions” at NAHBS that make me believe they should be judged completely by attendees and not so called panelists or experts of any sort, or simply be removed all together. To new builders and people who have attended multiple times the show feels very much like a cool kids club, and if you are not in it, good luck winning anything, good luck even forming lasting relationships or getting decent press coverage.


    1. Author
      Padraig

      TobinH: 400km events are at the shallowest end of a very long tail. Population aside, I don’t see rando bikes at ANY of the longer events I go to. And when I’ve been in Europe, though admittedly, I don’t go in for PBP, I’ve never seen one of them. The larger point here is that there’s infinitely more demand for a more traditional steel road frame than one with five pounds of racks on it.

      Sam Klontz: My criteria are my criteria. By that, I mean they may not be yours or anyone else’s. I’ve had a couple of people tell me I’m wrong. That’s okay. I’m wrong by their criteria, but not by mine. I’ve spent my career writing about these people, their craft, and have seen customers stiffed by guys who got out of the biz, or bikes delivered that weren’t truly professional works. So I weight those who have a history of delivering good work. As to your accusation that NAHBS was a “cool kids club” I have to say I didn’t see anyone there acting elitist. I met some people I didn’t know, some of them new builders, and found everyone to be delightful. The history of the People’s Choice Winners suggests that most of those bikes are picked less for frame builder craft than paint, so it’s possible you’d be no more pleased if the crowd judged everything. Regarding press coverage, I’d have to say one what I’ve seen of previous coverage of NAHBS suggests people who couldn’t have gotten the time of day otherwise got great press for making the effort to go to NAHBS. That’s a win. I’m not the one who decided their should be awards, but since I was tapped to join the panel, I’ve made every effort to recognize bikes that show a great blend of craft, beauty and availability. Fortunately, even if you think I’m dead wrong to do so, the result has no effect on your ability to buy the bike of your dreams.

      As they say on TV, no harm, no foul.

    2. Victor

      Having attended three NHBSs and observed the exhibitos and their bikes, I completely agree with the above post’s last point.

  3. Pingback: NAHBS 14, Part V | RKP | StuffThatSpins.com

  4. TobinH

    Padraig:

    I certainly can’t argue what you see or do not see, but to suggest a 400km event is unusual or a rarity when discussing randonneuring is a bit strange, isn’t it? The standard rando events are the 200, 300, 400, 600 and 1200. A randonneur will generally do multiple 400+ events in a season. A rando bike, by definition, is a bike designed to excel in those events. Would you criticize a TT bike for being a niche category, and thus unusable for most of the population? The local rando events certainly have better attendance than the TTs!

    I’m just having a bit of a hard time wrapping my head around your argument, here. It seems you could just as easily dismiss almost any category of bike using similar reasoning? I certainly don’t see many mountain bikes at road events, after all….I would have to go to a mountain bike event.

    Oh, and no rando bike would ever have 5 lbs of racks…are we talking about the same thing here? Few randos would accept a bike over 25lbs! A rando bike is not a touring bike, or a porteur bike. It’s just a fast road bike with fenders, fat tires, and some method of carrying just enough stuff to see you through some weather and some food. The traditional designs carry it up front on a small rack. The idea is to cover ground as quickly as possible, randonneuring is not touring.


  5. Author
    Padraig

    You are correct that 400km isn’t unusual among long-distance events. But because I may have hit a nerve, I think you may have missed my point. My point is that brevets and randonnees are a tiny slice out of all cycling events. In the spirit of trying to realize as much commercial success as a custom frame builder can hope to achieve (a dicey proposition from the get-go), I think builders are well-served to market themselves by presenting frames with the broadest possible appeal. More warm bodies and all that.

  6. TobinH

    Haha, no, you didn’t hit a nerve…you issued a challenge: “Again, rando; I dare you to find 50 people in any community on the planet who are riding that style of bike as their primary rig.” I just don’t think an efficient bicycle that can carry your lunch is all that unusual.

    I’m still a bit confused by your point here, but I have to admit a grudging respect for a man who can – with apparent sincerity – talk about ‘the broadest possible appeal’ while admiring a fantastically expensive wooden ‘workman’s bike’ with axe-handle fork blades!


  7. Author
    Padraig

    TobinH: Thanks for that! That said, you’ve managed to highlight part of my issue with the Theme Bike category. Supposing you were a builder and I walked into your shop and asked for a wooden bike with axe handle forks. You’d call 911. I hope. Nothing against Calfee’s work on that bike. It’s absolutely creative and cool, but commercially viable it isn’t. At least not yet. It does go to the heart of my comments to you and Sam Kloontz. My personal feeling is that bikes like the Calfee don’t serve the larger purpose of the show, which ought to be to generate commerce for the builders showing there. Any other perspective isn’t as defensible for the simple reason that we now have 10 years of the show and evidence to support the idea that if builders aren’t generating sales at the show they don’t have a compelling reason to come back. Ergo, the show needs to sell bikes, bottom line.

  8. Doug M.

    Regarding rando bikes: I haven’t seen many of them here in upstate NY, but I would say they’re comparably represented with the number of NAHBSian road & cross bikes I’ve seen.

    Regarding fillet vs. lug vs. TIG: from the folks I know with steel fab skills, it comes down to background. If you already know how to TIG, that’s what you do. To get up & running fast, you use lugs and braze away. You master the art of gas brazing with fillets (and much filing). TIG requires LOTS of practice and expense before making anything rideable.

    Great photos and storytelling, as always.

  9. Patrick O'Brien

    If the show exists to allow builders to sell bikes, a rationale that makes complete sense to me, does unit price enter into judging decisions? I assume that a builder that takes enough orders at the show to fill his schedule for the year might not be too worried about awards during the show. Has that ever happened? Thanks.

  10. Les Borean

    Too bad, the porn filter in my browser blocked all the photos.

    What’s tough here is looking at these and not being able to reach out and touch the welds and curves and odd shapes.

  11. Pingback: Rad Dad SS CX by Lundbeck Cycles. | StuffThatSpins.com

  12. David

    Padraig: While I usually find you spot on, I’m not sure that you have a real grip on what a modern rando bike is/can be. Most of the folks I know with randonneur bikes use them as daily riders/city bikes/rain bikes/commuter bikes/winter bikes/bikes. If done well, they are light (sub 20 lbs), allow for the convenient carriage of small amounts of ‘stuff” in a handlebar bag on a small light front rack, and can be as crisp and responsive as most ‘dedicated’ road bikes. That sounds like commercial potential to me. Call Peter Weigle(or Jan Heine) for more.

    BTW, small correction, Jason Sanchez is Dave Wages’ painter of choice, not builder.

  13. harris

    Padraig: I always appreciate the dedication to the build of the complete bike in addition to the beauty of the handbuilt frame. How does a Dave Wages pick up a DA 7700 for his build? Great coverage, what an awesome timewaster at work. Thanks as always for the premium content.

  14. John Kopp

    Paradig: I take exception to your remark about Huffy! As I remember, Greg Lamond and Seven Eleven used Huffies during their racing years.

    I loved the wooden bike, especially his selection of the materials. It reminded me of a push bike (coaster bike, not sure on the nomenclature) that you showed for your two year old a couple of years ago. I believe it was made of plywood.

    Nice bikes. Lots of talent on display, and glad you are showing it here.

  15. Ken Blakey-Shell

    That Ti Tandem is a Quiring. The tandem is a 29er+ that Scott Quiring built for he and his wife to ride. Scott has been welding up yokes like that for his fat and 29er+ bikes and everytime I see one I am blown away by the quality of the welds on display. I currently have a Ti fat bike made by Scott and not only are the yokes impressive in their construction, they also create a super stiff drivetrain. The lack of flex really helps when running a belt drive (best option going for summer beach riding) and also for cramming in the biggest, meatiest tire possible for float in powder. I am able to run incredibly tight clearance on tires, chainrings and cranks with no issues with flex induced rub. I am a big guy that can put out a lot of power and have been really impressed with this design.

  16. Aar

    John Kopp: the Seven-Eleven team rode Serottas with Huffy branding / sponsorship for a few years. At least a few of them even had Serotta branding on the chain stays.

    1. John Kopp

      Aar: I knew that the bikes were made by special order, just didn’t remember who. I had asked at K-mart if I could order a Huffy like Greg Lamond rode, but they said no. I ordered a custom Trek 950 frame instead, and put together the components myself. It’s my favorite bike. I never owned a Huffy, but do have a Schwinn, which can really fly with the right stoker.

  17. Pingback: NAHBS via Padraig at Red Kite Prayer & Some Tandems | The TandemGeek's Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>